- From: Arthur Ryman <arthur.ryman@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:12:35 -0400
- To: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
+1 to the use of XSD facets (the ones that make sense). -- Arthur On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 2:27 AM, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > shapes-ISSUE-64 (XSD Datatype facets): Should the Core vocabulary support datatype facets such as sh:minInclusive and sh:maxLength? [SHACL Spec] > > http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/64 > > Raised by: Holger Knublauch > On product: SHACL Spec > > XML Schema has several datatype facets that sound useful for SHACL too. Popular examples include > > - minInclusive/minExclusive/maxInclusive/maxExclusive > - minLength/maxLength (XSD also has xsd:length) > - pattern (regex) > - fractionDigits/totalDigits > - whitespace > - stepValue (from schema.org may be useful to drive UIs) > > We need to decide whether we want to cover some of these as part of the standard or whether we leave them to the extension mechanisms. > > >
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2015 23:13:05 UTC