- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:59:43 -0700
- To: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>, public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-60: Shall SHACL support other extension languages beside SPARQL (like JavaScript)? saying yes, even though we may not define any such extension at this point, the design should allow it. I will be voting against this prpposal. There have been claims that this is like different style languages for HTML. This is a false analogy. With HTML style languages the HTML document specifies the style language, so the different style languages can have different behaviour. With different extension languages the data graph does not specify the extension language. This means that the different extension languages need to do the same thing. I don't see how this can be reasonably set up. peter -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVeLNPAAoJECjN6+QThfjzHdsIALAwPABXlj2It7b+dVIDtqfq oglHK5vax2lhdvce6VjHEQf5a8quYyX9s1Ul3xOH7olsyPL1z1A4y5yu02Nf1QUG UyuBnRWW7Lv0MbBJZYUT9N36QDRMox7WyZmaz444wEtER9X3Vmeuy0F9OGptHyi6 zYeYGK0aN8XxaAKWiHljYuMLjh0CUHSe17ddwgHNYuCvvYCCI2FSswS8QVqD6Jm4 /CeeMxAUS3OtxT7XFruv7dg85AC9GW3SJs6FA9eAnQmaVaFptF0NY88ccKJ4K1z3 5hPtQu5w/O0DiY5Es3ueTJLracKhnkrzXnpmtUx0HUeeIHE3FvknduIkEM3bm2I= =bOoa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2015 22:00:16 UTC