I have the following comments on the result vocabulary - I would still argue that sh:Error, sh:Warn, etc should be separate property (i.e. sh:level) and not mixed with the result type. - I would also like to have a result superclass so that people can extend the results to other formats. Besides these comments, I am fine with the current design. Best, Dimitris On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 2:57 AM, Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> wrote: > The current SHACL Reference draft defines a results vocabulary: > > http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl-ref/#results-vocabulary > > My proposal is to close ISSUE-51 [1] adopting this design (for now). It's > easy to modify at a later stage based on experience. > > Holger > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/51 > > -- Dimitris Kontokostas Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig & DBpedia Association Projects: http://dbpedia.org, http://http://aligned-project.eu, http://rdfunit.aksw.org Homepage:http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas Research Group: http://aksw.org
Received on Thursday, 30 July 2015 13:54:58 UTC