- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 05:36:06 +1000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
On 7/10/15 3:51 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > My view is that SHACL validation takes two inputs > 1/ a SHACL shapes graph > 2/ an RDF data graph or dataset This assumes that the whole graph is validated. In addition to that, there is a way of invoking the SHACL validation with more parameters: a) a given node in the graph b) a given node in the graph plus a specific shape to validate against See http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#operations Holger > > The output of SHACL validation is a set of constraint violations. > http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#violations states that these can be > encoded into an RDF graph and augmented with other information. Alternatively > you could think of these as just the results of the top-level SPARQL queries > corresponding to the shapes in the SHACL shapes graph. > > My test implementation of my proposal takes two URLs - for SPARQL endpoints > for the shape and data graphs - and prints the violations (i.e., the results > of the generated SPARQL queries). > > peter > > > On 07/09/2015 10:24 AM, Karen Coyle wrote: >> There are folks in my area who are interested in attempting to code some SHACL >> experimentally -- in part as a way to see if it works for the Cultural >> Heritage data and situation. The sticking point appears to be a lack of >> description of inputs and outputs to SHACL. >> >> Since some of you have already done coding, could you provide some >> input/output examples that could help these folks get started? >> >> Thanks, >> kc
Received on Thursday, 9 July 2015 19:36:41 UTC