- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 10:51:37 -0700
- To: kcoyle@kcoyle.net, "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
My view is that SHACL validation takes two inputs 1/ a SHACL shapes graph 2/ an RDF data graph or dataset The output of SHACL validation is a set of constraint violations. http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#violations states that these can be encoded into an RDF graph and augmented with other information. Alternatively you could think of these as just the results of the top-level SPARQL queries corresponding to the shapes in the SHACL shapes graph. My test implementation of my proposal takes two URLs - for SPARQL endpoints for the shape and data graphs - and prints the violations (i.e., the results of the generated SPARQL queries). peter On 07/09/2015 10:24 AM, Karen Coyle wrote: > There are folks in my area who are interested in attempting to code some SHACL > experimentally -- in part as a way to see if it works for the Cultural > Heritage data and situation. The sticking point appears to be a lack of > description of inputs and outputs to SHACL. > > Since some of you have already done coding, could you provide some > input/output examples that could help these folks get started? > > Thanks, > kc
Received on Thursday, 9 July 2015 17:52:12 UTC