On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> wrote: > On 1/26/15, 4:56 PM, Dimitris Kontokostas wrote: > >> >> This is exactly how RDFUnit deals with constraint discovery and I 'd >> definitely +1 this approach >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/ >> 2014Nov/0245.html >> > > Agreed, and I did not make that connection back then. It looks indeed very > similar. If you have time, maybe you want to go through the rest of the > RDFUnit vocabulary to see if LDOM could benefit from other RDFUnit > features? Maybe you can also help drafting an possible implementation - > what about ldom:context pointing at ldom:Context instances, which must be > URIs and may have ldom:subContextOf to form a simple inclusion hierarchy? > I waiting to finalize a bit on the constraint definition vocabulary, after that it would be easy to provide a draft (well, probably hacky) implementation of LDOM and suggest some missing RDFUnit features. Personally, my time is quite limited at the moment and I feel we are keep opening too many topics that I can deal with. Thanks, Dimitris > > Thanks! > Holger > > > -- Dimitris Kontokostas Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig Research Group: http://aksw.org Homepage:http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas
Received on Monday, 26 January 2015 08:28:58 UTC