W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > January 2015

Re: Shapes are Classes, even if you don't use rdf:type

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:16:33 +1000
Message-ID: <54C5E9D1.1000300@topquadrant.com>
To: public-data-shapes-wg <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
On 1/26/15, 4:56 PM, Dimitris Kontokostas wrote:
> This is exactly how RDFUnit deals with constraint discovery and I 'd 
> definitely +1 this approach
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2014Nov/0245.html

Agreed, and I did not make that connection back then. It looks indeed 
very similar. If you have time, maybe you want to go through the rest of 
the RDFUnit vocabulary to see if LDOM could benefit from other RDFUnit 
features? Maybe you can also help drafting an possible implementation - 
what about ldom:context pointing at ldom:Context instances, which must 
be URIs and may have ldom:subContextOf to form a simple inclusion hierarchy?

Received on Monday, 26 January 2015 07:17:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 26 January 2015 07:17:09 UTC