W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > January 2015

Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM)

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 16:29:16 +1000
Message-ID: <54C33BBC.40106@topquadrant.com>
To: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>

On 1/24/15, 4:03 PM, Jose Emilio Labra Gayo wrote:
> Also, although it was not the case in my example, there could be other 
> examples where you even don't define the type of the nodes. Some times 
> when you are modeling linked data portals that extract data from 
> relational databases or excel sheets, you extract values from tables 
> and link properties to them. You could assign those generated nodes an 
> rdf:type, but it should not be mandatory. And this is or will be a 
> very common use case for linked data applications.

If there is no rdf:type, which other information is used to determine 
what shape an instance is supposed to have? We need to clarify the 
starting points of constraint evaluation.

Received on Saturday, 24 January 2015 06:29:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Saturday, 24 January 2015 06:29:48 UTC