W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > January 2015

Re: User Stories wiki editing conflicts

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 17:03:27 -0500
To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Cc: Peter Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, public-data-shapes-wg <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20150109220308.GA27528@w3.org>
* Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> [2015-01-09 16:46+1000]
> On 1/9/2015 16:22, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> >
> >
> >On Jan 9, 2015 6:41 AM, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider"
> ><pfpschneider@gmail.com <mailto:pfpschneider@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> It seems to me that overwriting two hours-apart edits could
> >only have been done by having the entire document out for editing
> >for (those) hours.
> >
> >So it would seem, yet I made several edits 20 mins before and
> >during the WG call so a two-hour window is hard to reconcile.
> >Perhaps a cache problem on the first edit (though even that seems
> >unlikely)?
> >
> A caching problem sounds plausible, because some of my own edits
> that got lost were many days old, I believe even from before x-mas.
> Please let us know if you see a simple way to revert this (I am not
> an expert in the wiki system) or whether you want us to manually
> revert the lost content (would require everyone to review the diff
> below).
> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/index.php?title=User_Stories&curid=14&diff=707&oldid=706

I reverted 707 and re-added the edits I'd made. Because I'm
superstitious, I made a copy of the diffs:


Mediawiki appears to have done the right thing and applied the diffs
back onto the HEAD, but I'd like others to look to be sure.

> If this turns out to be a caching problem, maybe a bug report to the
> wiki maintainers would be in order.
> Holger


office: +1.617.599.3509
mobile: +

Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.

There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.
Received on Friday, 9 January 2015 22:03:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 9 January 2015 22:03:31 UTC