On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote: > > > On 27 Feb 2015, at 08:24, Dimitris Kontokostas < > kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote: > > > > @Richard, the user story S34 motivates this requirement, if you think > this requirement is not covered I could write an additional one or extend > the existing one > > Thanks for the pointer, Dimitris. I think a little bit more detail in S34 > would be good. The current story says that “only a true/false result would > be inadequate”, but it also says that one needs to know “where violations > are found”, which seems to motivate detailed validation reports. So some > specifics that explain why violations must be countable would be good. > I enriched the user story, if everyone agrees with the changes it can be changed in UCR as well https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/User_Stories#S34:_Large-scale_dataset_validation Thanks, Dimitris > > Thanks, > Richard > > > -- Dimitris Kontokostas Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig Research Group: http://aksw.org Homepage:http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas
Received on Friday, 27 February 2015 13:53:59 UTC