Proposed revision of user story S14: Object Reconciliation from Richard Cyganiak on 2015-02-25 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from February 2015)

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:21:48 +0000
To: David.Martin@nuance.com
Cc: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <19ABF2D8-EA7A-47C4-8ABA-30F8615BBFFE@cyganiak.de>

Hi David,

You proposed a user story for the Shapes WG: S14 - Object Reconciliation
https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/User_Stories#S14:_Object_Reconciliation

We discussed it during the F2F last week. There were concerns that the story targets inference rather than validation. I took an action to propose a revision that separates the “inference” aspect from the “validation” aspect.

Here’s what I came up with:

https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/User:Rcygania2/S14_Revision

This is quite watered down compared to your version, in that it only aims at performing QA or sanity checks on the output of an object reconciliation tool, rather than having the Shapes checker acting *as* an object reconciliation tool by inferring owl:sameAs triples.

Do you still see value in this watered-down version?

Would you support replacing your original version with this revision?

(For the Tracker: This is ACTION-10.)

Thanks,
Richard

Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2015 10:22:18 UTC