- From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 16:53:58 -0500
- To: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>
- Cc: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Eric/Richard, I just created User Story S40. [1] [1] https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/User_Stories#S40_Describing_Inline_Content_versus_References "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org> wrote on 02/19/2015 09:38:34 AM: > From: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org> > To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> > Cc: Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > Date: 02/19/2015 09:42 AM > Subject: Re: Use cases for RDF Datasets in shape validation? > > * Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> [2015-02-19 07:55+0000] > > Hi Arthur, > > > > You said in yesterday's F2F discussions that you think of shapes > as being evaluated against an RDF Dataset, not just a single RDF graph. > > > > Are there recorded user stories or use cases, or any other > documentation, that motivate the necessity for this? > > I don't think so.
Received on Saturday, 21 February 2015 21:54:31 UTC