Re: status of Editors' Draft of UC&R

that should already be fixed!

simon

---
DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal
Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna

www: http://www.steyskal.info/  twitter: @simonsteys

Am 2015-02-17 19:04, schrieb Peter F. Patel-Schneider:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> The draft says that it is a FPWD.  It should be changed to Editors' 
> Draft.
> 
> peter
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
> 
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU44KXAAoJECjN6+QThfjzkLAH/0BuAzn1lP7ektZwo2PcExgN
> 7+360OUAmoKLlnjzYmZV8PvjI7zvPkHZs/pH3koc4Bs+v719X/1gNc5vKuprLmfV
> eFO8dD3gizuSH5xj2akxp5M/r/75uXLVztk9ussGdYeRDekuIsVFggvoT3S2zfzs
> gwLIrheH2cbbU6HEKKiBmgOU5T0YHTIEnY/PjMGjlxYke0L8vBUjXNzffh1wtWas
> D6gJY25ZXIBSh3ohsgMXMguaennS1A9Qsbik4E78kqcx+6/0mI5dDbm4iT+Rbeku
> Qm1IeXS1mgVvVXgxnbt2PC7VlqKGdImmk5D/L2wgb3msoaBz304joIwNxYJCrHA=
> =hLsc
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2015 18:08:40 UTC