Re: Two Standards ? NO, Please STOP this now.

I'd like everyone to stop posting to this thread now.

Discussing splitting our effort is premature and is a distraction we don't 
need.

Our charter does provide for an "OPTIONAL - Compact, human-readable, 
non-RDF syntax " a la ShExC and this is still very much a possibility. But 
I expect this to be a layer on top of the Vocabulary and Semantics we are 
to deliver not something that is fundamentally different so, it has in no 
bearing on issues such as whether shapes ought to be classes or not.

Thanks.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - 
IBM Software Group