Re: Issues with your User Stories for the RDF Data Shapes WG

I have made some clarifications to
https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/User_Stories#S10:_card_.3E.3D_0
S-10, as requested.   During the SC meeting, a number of folks said that
they were accustomed to using this pattern, but I suspect that what they
mean by it is not entirely consistent.  I think that Shapes could create
something that covers the uses of this pattern in a more consistent,
standard way.

I outlined my understanding of its use in FIBO at the moment.  The use that
I describe is highly non-standard, hence the request for Shapes to treat
it.  Also, the meaning I have for it is much simpler than the ongoing
discussion that Irene and Peter had on this issue (which I think covers
some very useful cases as well).


All of these things seem to be special cases of S-11, since they are
specific model-driven drivers for the UI.



Dean




On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi Dean,
>
> Unfortunately we haven't heard from you in a while and there are some
> issues that were raised against some of the user stories you contributed.
> I'd like to know whether you would care to try and address them or if we
> should do as we see fit - which may include abandoning them.
>
> See the following:
>
> ISSUE-11 - S9 impossible
> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/11
>
> ISSUE-12 - S10 story upgrade
> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/12
>
> Best regards.
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Standards - IBM
> Software Group
>