Re: Shape Selectors

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I don't see this as a desirable feature for the output from the working
group.  In my view, the working group should pick some vocabulary/syntax for
these features and stick to that vocabulary/syntax.

peter


On 02/10/2015 03:43 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
> I have just pushed a new "meta" feature to the LDOM system vocabulary
> that can be used to represent which properties shall be used to drive the
> LDOM engine. This is an attempt to formalize and generalize the issue of
> classes-vs-shapes into a solution that everyone could live with.
> 
> Here are the details:
> 
> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Shape_Selectors
> 
> I believe this offers the maximum flexibility so that platforms can pick
> which properties (such as oslc:instanceShape/oslc:classShape) they would
> like to use. This approach allows applications to pick whether they want 
> backward-compatibility with RDFS classes or use stand-alone shapes, or
> even both!
> 
> Any feedback?
> 
> Thanks, Holger
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU22XkAAoJECjN6+QThfjzG0IH/3CbZvBd9ATAAUY4/c6Tm5CF
CGSXocGc6AvtE72khccOvxzABD9HxiOGcEFhm98PWYZR+En8nSrl1bvf/hV7UiJU
yxezPuwwCi5YcBC0np2DkPafdyt52j9rDDINdy8F08W91WzaME5MhPhhTbXu/DbN
shCS2JF4k75BAKHtOKg8v24YfRxAhNeVF+D+lqCPdiKcL7d7FqhT/rwg4Og8/KHE
RESSNa1uhd5svM+JHD9v8x1qP3DGOcX8AtAaLhviYAUDg456zVeHhC2HjKxWUvOR
2QEPC0YTShp4+e0yZTlyISIYhdmay+j5nXzI6eK54wgo41axg93K9SQAsrrg84Q=
=AG8s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2015 14:24:08 UTC