Re: another pass at shapes distinct from classes docs

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/06/2015 06:34 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> * Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> [2015-02-06
> 06:11-0800]

[...]
> 
>> Another problem is that the document is very unclear as to which world
>> LDOM lives in.  Is it RDF or linked data?  LDOM can live in the RDF
>> world and be applied to linked data, but if LDOM lives in the linked
>> data world then it will be difficult to use LDOM outside of the linked
>> data world.
> 
> Ouch, marketing impasse. Can we forget about this for the time being?
> 
> Some folks want to market this as Linked Data. Others say "it's just RDF,
> damnit." In fact, I'm more sympathetic to the RDF crowd but I don't think
> this is a real technical issue. If it's designed for RDF, of course it
> applies to Linked Data. There are no rules asserting what Linked Data (I
> have a mug, but I don't think it's authoritative) so I don't think you
> can find anything that works for Linked Data that doesn't also work for
> RDF. PROPOSAL: We don't need to resolve this before FPWD.
> 

Maybe, but wording like "find the definition of X on the web" is going to be
hard to retract.  (Not that I'm saying that the primer has this sort of
wording, but it is a big difference between RDF and linked data.)

peter

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU1NqGAAoJECjN6+QThfjzHcsH/Rkc4ziebzmeMTVkMRLnuas5
SjSlvgq7dQXc+2XfG4o0wxjq1eybHM7+KrDBo60+ZNCRKarHmBiZVovETqXfkt5O
5Ub5Jy89ofW7AhD0Ofks0zma6kZM9vPyM0fbZdo9YOXQFRuRhlJECUsdPbDf5Wq8
6WC0+pU1bZgapkfctEEXV/XTByFE1zkBJR3rn9KZ3Pp+VUKlyZsISt2vRu9Lz2Ga
+Rf/4fOslh5U33E5VoPnYnfAgcL+XF6w7RI3305JD5A4bVdpdmm+WkiIPXB8mux/
9L9dZRfquILYYHA859WBVEWLdQ6ON5la7Tqy2KjDoic+TwHEZZIAuvg4uJqUBWI=
=1C3U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Friday, 6 February 2015 15:15:47 UTC