- From: Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at>
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 09:20:42 +0100
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Cc: Public-data-shapes Wg <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
> I do think that some of the user stories may have been changed. I'll > summarize my current thinking of the status of each of the relevant > user > stories here. thx, peter! simon --- DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna www: http://www.steyskal.info/ twitter: @simonsteys Am 2015-02-03 20:53, schrieb Peter F. Patel-Schneider: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > You can check to see who raised an issue by looking at its page in > tracker. > I am the person who raised all these issues. There has been no > notification that I have noticed indicating that any change has been > made to > any of these user stories. > > > > I do think that some of the user stories may have been changed. I'll > summarize my current thinking of the status of each of the relevant > user > stories here. > > ISSUE-8 User story S6 > > This may have changed somewhat. It appears to be asking for partial > ontology import. There is still no connection to constraints or > shapes. > > ISSUE-9 User story S7 > > The creator of this user story agrees that it is a repeat of S4, and > can be > removed. I have updated the status. > > ISSUE-11 User story S9 > > The continuing problem with user story S9 is that it asks for something > to > exist but not be specified. It is unclear as to what that means. > Discussion on the user story may have cleared up the confusion, but the > beginning of the story is still unclear. > > ISSUE-12 User story S10 > > The description of the story is still very limited. > > ISSUE-13 User story S12 > > This user story still contains no details as to what is supposed to be > happening. > > ISSUE-14 User story S14 > > This user story still has unresolved discussion. > > ISSUE-15 User story S17 > > This story is about referring to part of a data set. The connection to > constraints is unclear, even though it talks about shapes. > > ISSUE-16 User story S18 > > This story is about exporting part of an RDF graph. It appears to be > very > similar to S17. The connection to constraints is similarly unclear. > > ISSUE-17 User stories S19 and S20 > > User story S19 is about querying to find out what should be in some > data as > opposed to constraints on what is in the data. It is unclear what role > constraints have in this story. > > User story S20 is very similar to S19. It is similarly unclear as to > what > role constraints have in this story. > > > > peter > > > > On 02/03/2015 10:59 AM, Simon Steyskal wrote: >> Hi! >> >> May I ask the creators of issue: >> >> ISSUE-8 ISSUE-9 ISSUE-11 ISSUE-12 ISSUE-13 ISSUE-14 ISSUE-15 ISSUE-16 >> ISSUE-17 >> >> to check whether their issues were addressed and if so, if those >> issues >> can be closed. >> >> thx, simon >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1 > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU0SczAAoJECjN6+QThfjzH6UIAKnKrTJJ9DbLDietKH0lCCdP > Bosad2he2SLTFUglmRcp26pqBBGjtCey26iNZw8Svd8FoCvBT+bmecRaoeJW2U05 > 3De5mChFReKr2vg0JvKXX0UEtlMyHcF0zDqTOpbpM6PiJ14Ua9K12HpE0E4q3z2I > AAh912hqrjGhY7gFU5LmgvNVBSdbb8LtGLLtqi93L7keIOfJJHBX0aBmIJwKi9wd > iCueb5ZViHd35xwSyDXQftCrHoshJW0jdZLdZ15o6DtfLxpQbl2GPFple5bDo6Md > q0xU2oLXTmHJCXCCQr/Q3z3DgUvvHfTNPZts42A4dVppsiOABUc9fJZlxAWvXDk= > =pOYI > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2015 08:21:09 UTC