- From: Arthur Ryman <arthur.ryman@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 14:01:52 -0400
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 04/27/2015 12:50 PM, Arthur Ryman wrote: >> I reviewed Peter's spec [1] and have some feedback. First, I think this >> is a positive contribution and is complementary to Holger's spec. >> >> This spec is a great example of how to define the semantics of a language >> by translating that language into SPARQL. We can use this approach with >> other language proposals. >> >> The semantics of the language is not completely defined using SPARQL. >> There is an upper control layer that is described informally. If we make >> this upper control layer a little more flexible then we should be able to >> support recursion. > > I would like to see how this would work. > I'll write up something. -- Arthur
Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2015 18:02:24 UTC