Re: Role of SPARQL

Hi Arnaud,

out of curiosity, do you have some rough idea about when we will have 
sufficient user stories so that we can take the next steps?


On 11/25/2014 11:20, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
> wrote on 11/24/2014 12:29:38 AM:
> > ... I
> > guess I am disagreeing with the suggestion from Arnaud to specify
> > this without reference to a technology; I think that referring to
> > SPARQL in particular buys us a lot.
> To clarify, I'm not suggesting we specify our solution without 
> reference to a technology. What I'm saying is that I don't know that 
> we can say that the reference technology should be SPARQL without 
> knowing what our solution might look like. Depending on the approach 
> we choose something else than SPARQL might be more appropriate. Saying 
> now that whatever we do has to be defined in SPARQL reduces our choices.
> In line with what Peter said, this seems premature.
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Standards - 
> IBM Software Group

Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2014 01:25:16 UTC