Re: Glossary for the working group

On 11/19/2014 10:47 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> Fabulous, totally needed. Couple nits inline.
> You make reference to validating graphs but we may want to validate multiple
> graphs with respect to reach other (feature req from Jeremy Carroll and
> others). In the context of validation or type matching on RDF datasets, we
> *may* want to distinguish between an RDF database and a subset of it which is
> being validated.

Have we pulled this feature into any of our stories?


Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2014 21:05:56 UTC