- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:03:06 +0100
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
On 11/17/2014 05:03 AM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > I just added a user story for Hydra > > https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/User_Stories#S29:_Describing_interoperable.2C_hypermedia-driven_Web_APIs_.28with_Hydra.29 > > > This is a W3C community group with 100+ participants, working on what > appears to be an overlapping problem space to ours. Their vocabulary > includes the notion of "supported properties" which may align with > oslc:property, owl:Restriction etc. Like our own WG, this effort is > still evolving, so I am wondering whether it makes sense to try to > coordinate efforts towards an alignment between vocabularies before > things diverge into parallel universes... +1 During TPAC session SocialWG + Schema.org, Sandro Hawke also mentioned Data Shapes when we discussed overlapping but different approaches in Hydra, Activity Streams Action Handlers and Schema.org/Action * https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2014/SessionIdeas#Schema.org_and_Social_WG * http://www.hydra-cg.com/spec/latest/core/#documenting-a-web-api * http://schema.org/docs/actions.html * http://elf-pavlik.wwelves.org/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/activitystreams2-actions.html#parametersObject (outdated version of spec!) I will add Data Shapes WG to the list of groups relevant to work in Social Activity: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg#Related_Organizations Cheers!
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2014 14:05:16 UTC