- From: Simon Steyskal <ssteyska@wu.ac.at>
- Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 09:16:33 +0100
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Cc: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
works for me simon --- Dipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna www: http://www.steyskal.info/ twitter: @simonsteys Am 2014-11-07 09:07, schrieb Eric Prud'hommeaux: > * Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> [2014-11-07 12:01+1000] >> I have to confess the current time of our weekly meetings is killing >> me. Getting up between 1 am and 2 am wouldn't be too bad, but some >> of you may know how hard it is to get sleep either before or after >> such a time slot. Basically my next working day happens in zombie >> mode. >> >> Looking at the previous list of attendees we have very few people >> from Europe showing up. Getting those (1-2) participants accept a >> time slot shortly after dinner time would open up the following >> possibility: >> >> - US West Coast: 11 am >> - US East Coast: 2 pm >> - Central Europe: 8 pm >> - Queensland: 5 am > > * Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> [2014-11-06 > 20:53-0800] > [from a separate thread] >> In fact, 11am PT on Wednesdays is much worse for me than the current >> time, as I have a recurring conflict at that time. Of all the >> possible times for having the working group meetings, 11am is the >> one where I have the most conflicts that would be hard to move. > > Peter, 1-1.5hrs later be better? 9 or 9:30pm is actually better for me > because I have generally managed to tranquilize my daughter by then. > > Who can make > - US West Coast: noon > - US East Coast: 3 pm > - Central Europe: 9 pm > - Queensland: 6 am > or 30 mins later?
Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 08:16:59 UTC