- From: Simon Steyskal <ssteyska@wu.ac.at>
- Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 07:23:57 +0100
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <rad156v6d3e7ic6nm0j3fwpt.1415341437766@email.android.com>
however, I guess it's easier for us to switch to the 8pm timeslot than for Holger to stick to the 1am/2am-ish one.. simon -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- Von: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com> Datum:07.11.2014 06:04 (GMT+01:00) An: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org Cc: Betreff: Re: Weekly phone call times I believe that there are seven members-in-good-standing of the working group who are located in Europe, representing four W3C members and the W3C itself. peter On 11/06/2014 06:01 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > I have to confess the current time of our weekly meetings is killing me. > Getting up between 1 am and 2 am wouldn't be too bad, but some of you may know > how hard it is to get sleep either before or after such a time slot. Basically > my next working day happens in zombie mode. > > Looking at the previous list of attendees we have very few people from Europe > showing up. Getting those (1-2) participants accept a time slot shortly after > dinner time would open up the following possibility: > > - US West Coast: 11 am > - US East Coast: 2 pm > - Central Europe: 8 pm > - Queensland: 5 am > > which much much better aligns with my bio clock. Even 4 am would be much > better than 1 am for me. I believe this time slot would also work better for > US West Coast people than 7 am. > > May I carefully check whether there is any theoretical chance of such a > change, at least alternating every other week? Apologies to my friends in > Europe and the planning overhead! I would totally withdraw my proposal if we > had more people from Europe attending. > > Thanks > Holger > >
Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 06:24:27 UTC