- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:39:59 -0600
- To: public-cwm-talk <public-cwm-talk@w3.org>
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 21:55 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: > I found another bug. This time I isolated it to a test case: [...] > That's as far as I got; I tried to figure out what unify() > returns in order to pass it to BecauseBuiltIn, but I got > lost in the code. OK, fixed it. ---------------------------- revision 1.100 date: 2009/12/17 04:37:56; author: connolly; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1 fix reverse function proof ---------------------------- The code for ReverseFunction is a copy-and-paste of the code for Function with the roles reversed, and I found one place where they weren't reversed. Ugh... I should have factored out the duplication, but I guess I'm a little lazy. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 17 December 2009 04:40:09 UTC