- From: Tim rdf <timrdf@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:36:15 -0400
- To: Chris Spencer <chrisspen@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-cwm-talk@w3.org
(List folk: please let us know if this is off topic for this list) Chris, Do you have any current non-N3 representations of your example sentence? I am not familiar with building parse trees, but if you have a current format I'd be show you a N3-version of it. Regards, Tim Lebo On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Chris Spencer <chrisspen@gmail.com> wrote: > I apologize if this isn't the place for N3 questions, but I can't seem > to find a dedicated public forum for N3. > > Is N3 descriptive enough to represent an arbitrarily complex parse > tree for a sentence? I've been reading over the spec, but I'm finding > it a little unintuitive, and most of the examples don't approach the > complexity of natural language. > > I'm curious to see if I can take natural language text, generate a > parse tree, and convert it into N3, which I can then more easily query > using a semantic reasoner like CWM. > > For example, given the lengthy sentence, "The meeting of the > shareholders of the company shall be held at a place deemed > appropriate by a majority vote of the shareholders, to be determined > no less then a month before the meeting and no more than 6 months > before the meeting", how would that look in N3? > > I think I grasp the "x of y of z" form to look like :z!:y!:x in N3, > and simple SVO forms to look like ":s :v :o" in N3, but I don't see > how more complicated nested structures would look. How does N3 > represent prepositions like "at" and "to", nested triples, or logical > AND and OR statements? Is there an existing namespace for common > English vocabulary, like "determined", "before", etc? > > Regards, > Chris > >
Received on Thursday, 15 October 2009 15:36:49 UTC