- From: luc peuvrier at home <lc.pvrr@orange.fr>
- Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:44:16 +0100
- To: <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Cc: "DIG group" <diggers@csail.mit.edu>, "++jean marc vanel" <jeanmarc.vanel@gmail.com>, "cwm talk" <public-cwm-talk@w3.org>, <public-cwm-talk-request@w3.org>, "Yosi Scharf" <syosi@mit.edu>, "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <8A66D5C15FB54A6D839E8EBB8FFCC63C@LUCIO>
Jos, You are right according to that is why Tim and Dan in http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/n3/#keywords I have this ambigous problems only because the parsing implementation I made whithout preprocessing. Sorry to make a "bad spot" Kind regards, Luc Peuvrier ----- Original Message ----- From: jos.deroo@agfa.com To: lc.pvrr@orange.fr Cc: DIG group ; ++jean marc vanel ; cwm talk ; public-cwm-talk-request@w3.org ; Yosi Scharf ; Tim Berners-Lee Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 6:33 PM Subject: Re: n3 grammar : ambiguity for integer and decimal Luc, > There is no problems with "@is", "@of", and "@a" and I think that is why Tim and Dan in http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/n3/#keywords say that [[ The grammar is written as without reference to the keywords system at all, on the assumption that the string has been preprocessed by a keyword processor to put a "@" on all keywords and a ":" on all qnames in the default namespace. ]] Kind regards, Jos De Roo | Agfa HealthCare Senior Researcher | HE/Advanced Clinical Applications Research T +32 3444 7618 http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ Quadrat NV, Kortrijksesteenweg 157, 9830 Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium http://www.agfa.com/healthcare "luc peuvrier at home" <lc.pvrr@orange.fr> Sent by: public-cwm-talk-request@w3.org 02/21/2009 05:56 PM To "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org> cc Jos De Roo/AMDUS/AGFA@AGFA, "cwm talk" <public-cwm-talk@w3.org>, "DIG group" <diggers@csail.mit.edu>, "Yosi Scharf" <syosi@mit.edu>, "++jean marc vanel" <jeanmarc.vanel@gmail.com> Subject Re: n3 grammar : ambiguity for integer and decimal Tim, Thank you to take care of my spot. An other ambiguity I discovered writing n3 parser that I did not mentionned is about "is" "of" and "a" keyword. There is no problems with "@is", "@of", and "@a" since the @ make able to distinguish to a qname, it is not the case with "is" "of" and "a" keyword because it also match qname non terminal. I have this since I have the following rules not in n3 grammar: verb <- ( "is" | "@is" ) expression ( "of" | "@of" ) for the entry " :jmv is :guru of :luc ." it match at the same time simpleStatement | subject propertylist | | | verb object objecttail propertylisttail | | | | | | | | void void :jmv is :guru and simpleStatement | subject propertylist | | | verb object objecttail propertylisttail | | | | | | "is" expression "of" | | | | | | | | | | :jmv is :guru of :luc void void so there is a shift/reduce conflict between verb <- expression and verb <- is expression of this can be solve saying qname can not have the value "is" "of" Best regards Luc Peuvrier ----- Original Message ----- From: Tim Berners-Lee To: luc peuvrier at home Cc: cwm talk ; DIG group ; Yosi Scharf Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 12:40 AM Subject: Re: n3 grammar : ambiguity for integer and decimal Luc, thanks for spotting that. It seems to make sense. I have checked it in as the new n3.n3 Tim On 2009-02 -12, at 18:26, luc peuvrier at home wrote: Hi, Looking for integer and decimal non terminal ( token ) definition on following n3 grammar specification: http://www..w3.org/2000/10/swap/grammar/n3-report.html and http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/grammar/n3.n3 The ebnf definition for integer and decimal are: integer : [-+]?[0-9]+ decimal : [-+]?[0-9]+(\.[0-9])? There is an ambiguity since "123" ( for example ) match integer and decimal I propose decimal : [-+]?[0-9]+\.[0-9]* Width the above definition "123" match only integer, "123." match decimal. This look like C and Java standard for numéric constants Best regards Luc Peuvrier
Received on Saturday, 21 February 2009 18:44:55 UTC