- From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 16:21:26 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, Yosi Scharf <syosi@MIT.EDU>, public-cwm-talk@w3.org, Robert Crowell <crowell@MIT.EDU>
On Feb 8, 2006, at 13:26, Dan Connolly wrote: > On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 13:12 -0500, Tim Berners-Lee wrote: >> On Feb 8, 2006, at 10:40, Dan Connolly wrote: >> >>> Yosi, Tim, Eric, >>> >>> The SPARQL parser in cwm... it seems to be built from EricP's >>> BNF... >>> >>> >>> | if web: >>> | File = urllib.urlopen('http://www.w3.org/2005/01/yacker/ >>> uploads/sparqlTest/bnf') >>> -- http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/sparql/sparql-grammar.py >>> >>> In the DAWG, the editors added a .jj version of the grammar >>> and are considering what other formats to publish. >>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/parsers/sparql.jj >>> <- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/parsers/ >>> <- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#sparqlGrammar >>> >>> Is BNF the one we want/need? >>> >> >> Yes, please. This has been a long-standing informal request. > > I'm surprised. > > To be clear: you do _not_ want n3/turtle? On the contrary, yes, I would like it in RDF, using the same context-free grammar ontology please, but any syntax out of RDF/XML or any subset of N3.
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2006 21:23:53 UTC