Re: quick note on using list:in with SPARQL? [was: querying RDF lists]

Yes Dan, will do my utmost best to spare some time to do so (and you 
kindly asked
that before, but have so much on my todo stack .. :))
At least I'm very happy that we can run such queries with cwm as pointed 
out in

Jos De Roo, AGFA

PS slightly related and in realm of fuzzy set, cwm seems to loop with last 
{?X :mu (?C ?M). (1.0 ?M) math:difference ?N} => {?X :mu 
(?C^owl:complementOf ?N)}.
i.e. it loops for 3rd n3ql query in
when running
cwm -think 

when running
euler -nope -think -query

we get answer


Dan Connolly <>
05/10/2005 17:48

        To:     "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <>, Jos 
De_Roo/AMDUS/MOR/Agfa-NV/BE/BAYER@AGFA, "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" 
        Subject:        quick note on using list:in with SPARQL? [was: querying RDF lists]

On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 11:55 +0100, Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote:
[... a comment on SPARQL ...
I'm following up here in public-cwm-talk ...]
> > See:
> > a service description approach to accessingCollections
> >
> > 
> I hadn't thought of this solution.  Given this, I understand the WG's 
> I think it would be helpful if someone wrote this up in the near future 
- maybe DAWG could write a short note describing the options?  Linked from 
the SPARQL language spec so it's easy to find? 

Yes, I have been thinking about it for a while.

Jos, EricP, did I ever ask you about that?
Are you interested to write a little 2 page
note on querying lists with list:in ?

Anybody else?

Dan Connolly, W3C
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2005 23:00:05 UTC