- From: <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 00:59:38 +0200
- To: connolly@w3.org
- Cc: "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>, dwood@mindswap.org, "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>, public-cwm-talk@w3.org
Yes Dan, will do my utmost best to spare some time to do so (and you
kindly asked
that before, but have so much on my todo stack .. :))
At least I'm very happy that we can run such queries with cwm as pointed
out in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cwm-talk/2005JulSep/0001.html
--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
PS slightly related and in realm of fuzzy set, cwm seems to loop with last
rule
{?X :mu (?C ?M). (1.0 ?M) math:difference ?N} => {?X :mu
(?C^owl:complementOf ?N)}.
in http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/rpo-rules.n3
i.e. it loops for 3rd n3ql query in
http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/example003Q.n3
when running
cwm
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cwm-talk/2005JulSep/att-0021/example001P.n3
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cwm-talk/2005JulSep/att-0021/example002P.n3
http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/rpo-rules.n3 -think
-query=http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/example003Q.n3
when running
euler
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cwm-talk/2005JulSep/att-0021/example001P.n3
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cwm-talk/2005JulSep/att-0021/example002P.n3
http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/rpo-rules.n3 -nope -think -query
http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/example003Q.n3
we get answer
http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/example003E.n3
Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
05/10/2005 17:48
To: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>, Jos
De_Roo/AMDUS/MOR/Agfa-NV/BE/BAYER@AGFA, "Miles, AJ (Alistair)"
<A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
cc: public-cwm-talk@w3.org, dwood@mindswap.org
Subject: quick note on using list:in with SPARQL? [was: querying RDF lists]
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 11:55 +0100, Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Oct/0002.html
[... a comment on SPARQL ...
I'm following up here in public-cwm-talk ...]
> > See:
> > a service description approach to accessingCollections
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0169
> >
>
> I hadn't thought of this solution. Given this, I understand the WG's
position.
>
> I think it would be helpful if someone wrote this up in the near future
- maybe DAWG could write a short note describing the options? Linked from
the SPARQL language spec so it's easy to find?
Yes, I have been thinking about it for a while.
Jos, EricP, did I ever ask you about that?
Are you interested to write a little 2 page
note on querying lists with list:in ?
Anybody else?
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2005 23:00:05 UTC