- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 10:48:47 -0500
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, Jos De Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>, "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-cwm-talk@w3.org, dwood@mindswap.org
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 11:55 +0100, Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Oct/0002.html [... a comment on SPARQL ... I'm following up here in public-cwm-talk ...] > > See: > > a service description approach to accessingCollections > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0169 > > > > I hadn't thought of this solution. Given this, I understand the WG's position. > > I think it would be helpful if someone wrote this up in the near future - maybe DAWG could write a short note describing the options? Linked from the SPARQL language spec so it's easy to find? Yes, I have been thinking about it for a while. Jos, EricP, did I ever ask you about that? Are you interested to write a little 2 page note on querying lists with list:in ? Anybody else? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2005 15:48:55 UTC