- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 23:01:39 +0200
- To: "Yosi Scharf <syosi" <syosi@mit.edu>
- Cc: public-cwm-talk@w3.org, syosi@mit.edu, timbl@w3.org
In the euler implemention we have been experimenting with
{ :a . :b . :c } a math:Set .
It works, but we haven't much experience yet :)
--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Yosi Scharf <syosi@mit.edu>
Sent by: public-cwm-talk-request@w3.org
02/08/2004 21:06
To: public-cwm-talk@w3.org
cc: syosi@mit.edu, timbl@w3.org
Subject: Notation for sets in n3
Recently, it was decided that Cwm should have support for sets.
This leads to the question, what delimeter should a set have in n3? The
problem is n3 already use every ascii delimeter I can think of.
(...) is taken for lists
{...} is taken for formulae
[...] is taken for anonymous nodes
<...> is taken for resources
My father suggested «...», but being as that cannot be typed on a
standard keyboard, is unlikely to be useful.
My personal opinion is something like {|...|} would be best. Something
like $(...) might also work. It seems no matter what we do, readability
is compromised.
Yosi
Received on Monday, 2 August 2004 17:17:35 UTC