Re: javascript implementation update

Hi Bill,

You'll have seen my plea for implementation updates just now [1]. How is
your implementation going? Is there anything that we can do to help?

Thanks,

Jeni

[1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-csv-wg/2015Jun/0011.html

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Ingram, William A <wingram2@illinois.edu>
wrote:

> Jeni and Dan, etc,
>
> I've been off the radar, so to speak, for a few weeks due to some ongoing
> health issues. I will miss tomorrow's call too.
>
> I have continued to work on my js implementation, which I still fully
> intend to give to the group as a project deliverable. It works now for
> simple csv-to-json transformations, but doesn't make turtle (yet). My
> implementation is a stream transformation, so it is pretty fast and can
> theoretically handle input streams of any size.
>
> I'm a bit unclear on how simple "simple" needs to be. Does "simple" mean
> no metadata at all? Or is there a "simple" metadata transformation I need
> to implement?
>
> I have experimented with taking metadata from the link headers, etc;
> that's all pretty straight-forward. But merging multiple sources of
> metadata is, of course, not straight-forward, and obviously not simple.
> For now, my main concern is that my code fulfills the requirements of a
> simple implementation.
>
> I still need to document the project and clean up some rough bits. Then I
> can register as an official testing endpoint for Gregg's CSVW Test
> Harness. What's the deadline?
>
> That's all for now.
>
> Thanks,
> Bill
>
> --
> Bill Ingram
> Manager, Scholarly Communication and Repository Services
> University Library
> University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
> (217) 333-4648
> wingram2@illinois.edu
>
>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 3 June 2015 15:24:27 UTC