- From: Alfredo Serafini <seralf@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 14:18:00 +0200
- To: Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock@okfn.org>
- Cc: W3C CSV on the Web Working Group <public-csv-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADawF4Mn2oLK1r8ma8tct5ybPZvgR13bGUO-=+WGx6qjReitxw@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks very much for sharing the liks Rufus, sometimes I got lost in too many sources! :-) I'll certainly look at the spec soon as possible, this formats seem to be really helpful in several cases, thanks again! Alfredo 2015-07-02 14:15 GMT+02:00 Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock@okfn.org>: > @Alfredo: we very much want that but have been awaiting on final guidance > on the best way to do this, see: > > https://github.com/dataprotocols/dataprotocols/issues/110 > > esp: > > > https://github.com/dataprotocols/dataprotocols/issues/110#issuecomment-98147721 > > Please add a comment - or even better a pull request on the spec :-) > > Rufus > > On 2 July 2015 at 13:13, Alfredo Serafini <seralf@gmail.com> wrote: > >> thanks, good news! >> >> Any chance to see a JSON-LD @context inclusion in the schema part, at >> some point? This would improve re-use. >> >> Alfredo >> >> 2015-07-02 14:02 GMT+02:00 Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock@okfn.org>: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I wanted to flag that the Data Package suite of "proposals" which >>> includes: >>> >>> - Data Package - http://dataprotocols.org/data-package/ >>> - JSON Table Schema - http://dataprotocols.org/json-table-schema/ >>> - Tabular Data Package - http://dataprotocols.org/tabular-data-package/ >>> >>> Are being readied for submission as IETF RFC's. >>> >>> Folks on this list are no doubt very familiar with these as they formed >>> a basis for the initial CSV spec here (especially tabular data package). >>> >>> We have long planned to do this and have been waiting for the specs to >>> mature - especially actual implementations to exist - to submit as proper >>> RFCs and over the last year or so we've felt we're nearing that point and >>> so this should happen very soon. >>> >>> I wanted to flag now especially if there were any specific alignment >>> that could be done that would be great to do now - i know I have flagged >>> some issues on the dataprotocols tracker over the last year on this. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Rufus >>> -- >>> >>> *Rufus PollockFounder and President | skype: rufuspollock | >>> @rufuspollock <https://twitter.com/rufuspollock>Open Knowledge >>> <http://okfn.org/> - see how data can change the world**http://okfn.org/ >>> <http://okfn.org/> | @okfn <http://twitter.com/OKFN> | Open Knowledge on >>> Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/OKFNetwork> | Blog >>> <http://blog.okfn.org/>* >>> >> >> > > > -- > > *Rufus PollockFounder and President | skype: rufuspollock | @rufuspollock > <https://twitter.com/rufuspollock>Open Knowledge <http://okfn.org/> - see > how data can change the world**http://okfn.org/ <http://okfn.org/> | > @okfn <http://twitter.com/OKFN> | Open Knowledge on Facebook > <https://www.facebook.com/OKFNetwork> | Blog <http://blog.okfn.org/>* >
Received on Thursday, 2 July 2015 12:18:27 UTC