On 08 Oct 2014, at 11:30 , Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: > On 8 October 2014 10:16, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote: >> On 04/10/14 08:06, Ivan Herman wrote: >>>> >>>> 1. We define a small set of core properties that we consider to be >>>> essential in the metadata. "We define" means that we specify the terms to be >>>> used in the metadata specification as well as their data types and intended >>>> meaning >> >> >> This makes sense though I do have one small question: >> >> By "we define" do you include giving it a w3c-csv:xyz URI then define >> skos:/rdfs:/owl: mappings to other vocabularies? Or, if not, in what way is >> it different to defining a property or class? > > That (creating an actual vocabulary definition) sounds the simplest > way of making sure we're precise. However we might not want to be more > precise than the mass-deployment vocabularies we're basing it on, and > both DC and schema.org are pretty flexible. And of course it is > comically close to http://xkcd.com/927/ ... Yes, it is:-) hence my wish to keep that 'core' set of terms to a bare minimum. 4-5 terms. For all others, users would be expected to use qualified terms. Ivan > > Dan > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Digital Publishing Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 GPG: 0x343F1A3D WebID: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2014 09:58:02 UTC