- From: Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:07:29 +0000
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Cc: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, "public-csv-wg@w3.org" <public-csv-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <640DB4B3-923B-4221-9039-13DC84D850E2@gmail.com>
All - there are no new issues pending discussion for the mapping documents at this time. At this point I am yet to update the GitHub issues from last week (shame!) but promise to do so!!! However, I wonder if it might be worth looking once more at the data-format issue ... I have been trying to determine if the number and date formatting functions from 'XPath & XQuery Functions and Operators 3.0’ are workable. Also I have found Java <https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/text/SimpleDateFormat.html> and JavaScript <https://code.google.com/p/jaxson/source/browse/trunk/jaxson/WebRoot/jsSrc/org/jaxson/util/SimpleDateFormat.js?r=41> implementations of ‘simpledateformat’ that might also provide some clear insight. See ISSUE 54 <https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/54> for details. Basically, I would like to know what others think (re the complexity) before I plough on an spend time developing this further. Also keen to hear what JeniT has determined re the number formats. Jeremy > On 18 Nov 2014, at 13:51, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: > > We have agreed to drive our meetings from the Github issues list. > > https://github.com/w3c/csvw/labels/Requires%20telcon%20discussion/decision > doesn't show any different issues to those which we discussed in some > detail last week (http://www.w3.org/2014/11/12-csvw-minutes.html). > > Are there good candidate topics to discuss tomorrow? I don't mind > chairing if editors have topics they want to discuss, but equally > let's not have a meeting for meeting's sake. Jeni, editors - any > views? > > Dan >
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2014 16:08:12 UTC