- From: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:39:18 -0500
- To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Cc: CSV on the Web Working Group <public-csv-wg@w3.org>, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMVTWDyx216ycfEx+j8CyCFGRkTReSOCrKcf9EXDV-y-3WqSPw@mail.gmail.com>
In the RDB2RDF work, we focused only on RDB to RDF (no roundtrip). Therefore I agree with Jeni. Btw, I'm catching up on the emails and minutes on CSV2RDF and Direct Mapping. I hope that I will be able to contribute. Best, Juan Sequeda +1-575-SEQ-UEDA www.juansequeda.com On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>wrote: > Thanks Andy, > > One point that I think is an interesting question: you addressed the > preservation of column order at: > > https://www.w3.org/2013/csvw/wiki/CSV2RDF#Column_Order > > I think we should concentrate on conversion *to* the other formats (RDF > etc) rather than caring about round-tripping. So I'm not convinced of the > value of retaining this information in an RDF mapping. How do you see it > being used by an RDF-based application, aside from in reconstructing the > original CSV? > > Cheers, > > Jeni > > ------------------------------------------------------ > From: Andy Seaborne andy@apache.org > Reply: Andy Seaborne andy@apache.org > Date: 19 March 2014 at 21:11:49 > To: CSV on the Web Working Group public-csv-wg@w3.org > Subject: CSV2RDF > > > Some notes on CSV+ to RDF. > > > > https://www.w3.org/2013/csvw/wiki/CSV2RDF > > > > In no way is this completed work - consider it "in-progress". > > > > There seem to be three distinct levels to consider: > > > > 1. Tabular CSV to RDF > > 2. Annotated Data Model to RDF > > 3. Mapped Annotated Data Model to RDF > > > > and the content so far only considers levels 1 and 2 with no domain > > specific target data schema. > > > > Andy > > > > > > > > -- > Jeni Tennison > http://www.jenitennison.com/ > >
Received on Wednesday, 19 March 2014 23:40:06 UTC