- From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 23:18:08 +0000
- To: CSV on the Web Working Group <public-csv-wg@w3.org>, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
Thanks Andy, One point that I think is an interesting question: you addressed the preservation of column order at: https://www.w3.org/2013/csvw/wiki/CSV2RDF#Column_Order I think we should concentrate on conversion *to* the other formats (RDF etc) rather than caring about round-tripping. So I’m not convinced of the value of retaining this information in an RDF mapping. How do you see it being used by an RDF-based application, aside from in reconstructing the original CSV? Cheers, Jeni ------------------------------------------------------ From: Andy Seaborne andy@apache.org Reply: Andy Seaborne andy@apache.org Date: 19 March 2014 at 21:11:49 To: CSV on the Web Working Group public-csv-wg@w3.org Subject: CSV2RDF > Some notes on CSV+ to RDF. > > https://www.w3.org/2013/csvw/wiki/CSV2RDF > > In no way is this completed work - consider it "in-progress". > > There seem to be three distinct levels to consider: > > 1. Tabular CSV to RDF > 2. Annotated Data Model to RDF > 3. Mapped Annotated Data Model to RDF > > and the content so far only considers levels 1 and 2 with no domain > specific target data schema. > > Andy > > > -- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/
Received on Wednesday, 19 March 2014 23:18:31 UTC