- From: Ceolin, D. <d.ceolin@vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 21:47:22 +0000
- To: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
- CC: "Tandy, Jeremy" <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>, "W3C CSV on the Web Working Group" <public-csv-wg@w3.org>
Jeremy, Eric, sure, no problem. I'll finish to amend UC#20 and #22 and take care of UC#21. Cheers, Davide Il giorno 12/mar/2014, alle ore 22.40, Eric Stephan ha scritto: > Jeremy and Davide, > > My responses are below using a >> and capital letters. By use of the > capital letters I'm not shouting just helping making answers more > visible. :-) > > Thanks, > > Eric > > > 1) [Eric] add use case #16 City of Palo Alto tree data > >>> YES > > 2) [Eric] add use case #21 Displaying locations of care homes on a map > >>> POSSIBLY ADDED TO DAVIDE'S LIST? > > > 4) [Eric] tease out and make explicit the requirements in use > cases #7, #12 and #17 ... noting the implied "microsyntax" requirement > in #7 > >>> YES > > > Also, Eric: we previously talked about adding a use case about ncdump > (netcdf dump). Is this still necessary / feasible? > >>> YES > > Davide: it seems Eric has a lot still to do ... are you able to take > action #2 (adding use case #21 Displaying locations of care homes on a > map). Please refer to my earlier email for my thoughts on that use > case (not much to say - but could be helpful). > > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Tandy, Jeremy > <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk> wrote: >> Hi - in today's teleconf we agreed a number of things to complete for >> Monday. >> >> >> >> 1) [Eric] add use case #16 City of Palo Alto tree data >> >> 2) [Eric] add use case #21 Displaying locations of care homes on a map >> >> 3) [Davide] complete amendments to use cases about "intelligent >> preview" and "representing entities and facts" - see emails here and here. >> >> 4) [Eric] tease out and make explicit the requirements in use cases #7, >> #12 and #17 ... noting the implied "microsyntax" requirement in #7 >> >> 5) [Jeremy] renumber use cases into sequential order >> >> 6) [Jeremy] cluster requirements as proposed by JeniT >> >> >> >> We agreed that there were not, at this time, latent requirements from CSV-LD >> or CSV2RDF discussion threads. >> >> >> >> Also, Eric: we previously talked about adding a use case about ncdump >> (netcdf dump). Is this still necessary / feasible? >> >> >> >> Davide: it seems Eric has a lot still to do ... are you able to take action #2 >> (adding use case #21 Displaying locations of care homes on a map). Please >> refer to my earlier email for my thoughts on that use case (not much to say >> - but could be helpful). >> >> >> >> I'll do actions #5 and #6 on Monday morning based on the structure of the >> document I see at that point in time - so expect the use case numbers to >> have changed by Monday lunch time! >> >> >> >> Please let me know if I've got any of this wrong J >> >> >> >> BR, Jeremy >
Received on Wednesday, 12 March 2014 21:47:52 UTC