- From: Alfredo Serafini <seralf@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:12:22 +0100
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Cc: CSV on the Web Working Group <public-csv-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2014 09:12:49 UTC
Hi Andy, if you plan to mantain some source/documentation on github, that issue management it's really good, widely used, and permits also the usage of the @username reference, which may be used for discussing specific technical elements inline, as a sort of inline topic for every issue. Alfredo 2014-02-19 10:00 GMT+01:00 Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>: > On 05/02/14 13:17, CSV on the Web Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > >> ISSUE-1: There is no machine-readable mechanism available to describe how >> the set of files are related >> >> http://www.w3.org/2013/csvw/track/issues/1 >> >> Raised by: >> On product: >> > > I was going to try to extract some points from recent email discussions > and convert into possible issues. > > How are we gathering issues? Are we using that mechanism just yet? > > Which tracker? W3C or github? > > (The W3C one is linked from the home page. ISSUE-1 there is closed.) > > Andy > > >
Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2014 09:12:49 UTC