- From: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 07:54:43 -0800
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, "public-csv-wg@w3.org" <public-csv-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMFz4jhc-r5=-nx02mKQ3RqbSjFXdiWijG0RH7Pq7zUOwEf80Q@mail.gmail.com>
+1 Eric Stephan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Brickley [mailto:danbri@google.com] > Sent: 03 February 2014 17:22 > To: Jeni Tennison; Ivan Herman > Cc: public-csv-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: First Face-to-Face meeting > > Having talked over the results of this survey with Jeni and Ivan, we > conclude that there does *not* seem to be to be critical mass for the dates > proposed. And comparing travel schedules even amongst Ivan/Jeni/Dan it is > looking very challenging to find new candidate dates in the immediate - > feb/march/april/... future (especially noting that W3C asks for 8 weeks > notice to be given, to help people find reasonable travel/hotel options > etc.). > > Given all this, a new suggestion. That we make minimal or no use of > face-to-face meetings until a larger gathering - the W3C Technical Plenary > meeting, next one is Oct 27-31st 2014, Santa Clara < > http://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2014>, but that we kick off the group > 'remotely' rather than through a 'kickoff face to face meeting'. > > So - for now at least - Instead of flying everyone to a single location, > let's try to do our best to use the 'net (the usual email/wiki/phone/IRC > stuff but also maybe video e.g. Skype, > G+Hangouts, WebRTC or whatever) to make progress. We can also continue > the effort already begun in this thread, of sharing our existing travel > plans so that if small subsets of the Working Group are already planning to > attend various events, we can make the most of it. Andy Seaborne also > pointed out that some W3C groups have had regional meetings, e.g. recent > RDF WG had US (Boston) + UK (London) split meeting that was easier for > people to attend; we could explore similar mechanisms, or perhaps > organizing around sub-topics. > > In general W3C groups benefit a lot from face to face work. It helps > people understand each other, work closely together, etc. But there can > also be other significant costs involved beyond the merely financial - > travel, health, family, carbon footprint, day jobs, etc... So given our > scheduling difficulties, let's see what we can get done using this > new-fangled Internet thing... > > cheers, > > Dan > >
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2014 15:55:15 UTC