- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 17:55:04 -0400
- To: "public-csv-wg@w3.org" <public-csv-wg@w3.org>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, 'Gregg Kellogg' <gregg@greggkellogg.com>
http://w3c.github.io/csvw/syntax/#h_issue_7 says: [[ Issue 7 Used a suffix on filenames to find metadata about them, though we haven't decided what format metadata documents should be in, or even if they should be conneg'd. ]] The WG charter says that the metadata "should be defined, or should have an encoding, in standard RDF". One possibility would be to allow a related metadata document to be in any RDF-enabled format -- including CSV+. If a metadata document were supplied in CSV+ format, then it could be converted to RDF according to the same mapping rules as any other CSV+ document. This of course is recursive, but in practice the recursion would likely involve only one or two steps. David
Received on Sunday, 6 April 2014 21:55:33 UTC