- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 17:46:37 +0000
- To: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@fromoldbooks.org>
- Cc: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>, public-cssprint@w3.org
On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 at 15:23, Liam R. E. Quin <liam@fromoldbooks.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 2022-10-31 at 13:33 +0000, Dave Pawson wrote: > > How much of a moving target is the print element of CSS? > > I.e. to use as a target for objectives? > > Anyone familiar over time? > > It's very incomplete, at best working draft with incomplete proposals > partly in the specs, but as far as i can tell it's barely moved forward > in the past decade. > > It might be that a useful thing a CG could do would be to take some of > those proposals and some of the vendor extensions, and get them spec- > ready, and show implementations, whether in browsers or elsewhere. Positive, tks Liam > > Getting W3C to accept non-browser implementations has proved > problematic in the past, and is one reason why some of the work has > stalled. I don't know whether there has been any change in that regard, > though - it's possible. > > But just having complete, clear specs for the unfinished functionality > would help. +1 - hopefully we could grade the proposals from Scotch mist to doable? > > There's issues around line-breaking, around CJK formatting, indexing, > conditional text (e.g. for cross-references), and css page in general > seems very underspecified. Could these be graded in your view Liam? > > For browser support, we've got beyond the point where Netscape was > happy to put a page break anywhere, with a line of text chopped in half > so the tops of letters appeared on a different page than the bottoms > (!), but firefox still splits ligatures in half with an axe when it > does line-breaking. > > Despite all that, the commercial solutions work fairly well. The open > source ones tend not to support "advanced features" such as footnotes > or multiple columns or page-level floats, but are i think improving. Fair approach? Assess proposals, Doable thru to Scotch mist? Would that be a reasonable first pass approach? Are the right people here in the group to do that? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ.
Received on Monday, 31 October 2022 17:47:03 UTC