- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 18:42:31 -0500
- To: "Myles C. Maxfield" <mmaxfield@apple.com>
- Cc: Public CSS Test suite mailing list <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Le 2016-08-09 16:47, Myles C. Maxfield a écrit : [snipped] > The codepoints which are mapped to something else are the following: > > " " (U+20): No path but full advance > "p" (U+70): Path has 0 ascent but full descent > "É" (U+C9): Path has 0 descent but full ascent > Non-breaking space (U+A0): No path but full advance > Zero-width non-breaking space (U+FEFF): No path and 0 advance > En space (U+2002): No path and half advance > Em space (U+2003): No path but full advance > Three-per-em space (U+2004): No path and one third advance > Four-per-em space (U+2005): No path and one quarter advance > Six-per-em space (U+2006): No path and one sixth advance > Thin space (U+2009): No path and one fifth advance > Hair space (U+200A): No path and one tenth advance > Zero width space (U+200B): No path and no advance > Ideographic space (U+3000): No path but full advance > Zero width non-joiner (U+200C): No path and no advance > Zero width joiner (U+200D): No path and no advance > Greek capital letter Chi (U+3A7): Thin horizontal stripe and full > advance > "横" (U+6A2A): Thin horizontal stripe and full advance > Greek capital letter Upsilon (U+3A5): Thin vertical stripe and full > advance > "纵" (U+7EB5): Thin vertical stripe and full advance. Myles, I do not get the last 4 glyphs (2 thin horizontal stripe and 2 thin vertical stripe) in this test page: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/CSS3WritingModes/Ahem2016TestPage.html and I tried that test page with a browsershot web service and all the glyphs, except the last 4, were rendered on a non-Linux os. What am I missing here? What is wrong with that test page? The http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/CSS3WritingModes/support/ahem.ttf filesize is 13884bytes, so it is the correct, newest version of the ahem font. [Addendum: this page https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/Fonts/Ahem/ makes no mention of the 4 glyphs! It seems that the font I got from https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/Fonts/Ahem/ never was updated with the latest Ahem font version. The https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/Fonts/Ahem/ needs to be updated with the latest version of the Ahem font.] Gérard -- Test Format Guidelines http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-format-guidelines.html Test Style Guidelines http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-style-guidelines.html Test Templates http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-templates.html CSS Naming Guidelines http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-naming.html Test Review Checklist http://testthewebforward.org/docs/review-checklist.html CSS Metadata http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-metadata.html
Received on Thursday, 19 January 2017 23:43:07 UTC