- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:31:52 -0500
- To: Public CSS Test suite mailing list <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Hello, 32 new tests for section 7.3.1: sizing-orthog-prct-[ htb-in-vlr | htb-in-vrl | vlr-in-htb | vrl-in-htb ]-[001-008] These 32 tests checks how an orthogonal block is sized when its inline size is given a percentage value. The 4 possibilities of orthogonal context are checked http://hg.csswg.org/test/rev/8a0a8f2afe1a - - - - - - - 20 new tests for section 7.3.2: sizing-orthog-htb-in-vlr-[001-024] These 20 tests check the sizing of an 'horizontal-tb' orthogonal block with its inline size set to 'auto' inside an auto-sized 'vertical-lr' containing block under various code scenario conditions in relation with this complex formula: min(max-content, max(min-content, min(available space, initial containing block's size))) http://hg.csswg.org/test/rev/6f2742210ef9 - - - - - - - 20 new tests for section 7.3.2: sizing-orthog-htb-in-vrl-[001-024] These 20 tests check the sizing of an 'horizontal-tb' orthogonal block with its inline size set to 'auto' inside an auto-sized 'vertical-rl' containing block under various code scenario conditions in relation with this complex formula: min(max-content, max(min-content, min(available space, initial containing block's size))) http://hg.csswg.org/test/rev/0664939ab9ea - - - - - - - 20 new tests for section 7.3.2: sizing-orthog-vlr-in-htb-[001-024] These 20 tests check the sizing of an 'vertical-lr' orthogonal block with its inline size set to 'auto' inside an auto-sized 'horizontal-tb' containing block under various code scenario conditions in relation with this complex formula: min(max-content, max(min-content, min(available space, initial containing block's size))) http://hg.csswg.org/test/rev/3cef54b15491 - - - - - - - 20 new tests for section 7.3.2: sizing-orthog-vrl-in-htb-[001-024] These 20 tests check the sizing of an 'vertical-rl' orthogonal block with its inline size set to 'auto' inside an auto-sized 'horizontal-tb' containing block under various code scenario conditions in relation with this complex formula: min(max-content, max(min-content, min(available space, initial containing block's size))) http://hg.csswg.org/test/rev/ba4fb3bfec76 - - - - - - - Some comments about those tests. 1- Chrome 57.0.2970.0 and Edge 13 fail about 12% of all those 112 tests; for Chrome 57.0.2970.0, I will know exactly the numbers of failed tests later. Firefox 53.0a1 buildID=20170103030204 passes all 112 tests. 2- I will need a review so that these tests are correct. There is also 94 reference files which may need to be checked too. 3- I know that about 5% of those 112 tests may have problems with the test harness. Several tests requires that the initial containing block be taller than 500px. This may not actually happen with the test harness. This depends on your screen monitor resolution and size. I will either adjust those tests (change a few values or change the character data of blocks) later; I am not sure right now what's the best thing to do... but I am sure this issue can be solved elegantly. Gérard -- Test Format Guidelines http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-format-guidelines.html Test Style Guidelines http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-style-guidelines.html Test Templates http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-templates.html CSS Naming Guidelines http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-naming.html Test Review Checklist http://testthewebforward.org/docs/review-checklist.html CSS Metadata http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-metadata.html
Received on Wednesday, 4 January 2017 05:32:29 UTC