W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > April 2016

Re: Towards a better testsuite: Metadata

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:34:34 -0400
To: Geoffrey Sneddon <me@gsnedders.com>
Cc: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Message-ID: <570E913A.6010203@inkedblade.net>
On 04/13/2016 01:49 PM, Geoffrey Sneddon wrote:
> I think you can't count to three. :)

Caching is a Hard Problem. ;)

> I think everyone is happy to mirror such a directory structure (it is,
> after all, roughly what everyone does today). I don't think it
> requires people who use the tests to mirror the structure more than
> the current situation does—if you want two-way mirroring, you
> essentially have to use what the upstream repo uses anyway.

Sure, but we don't have two-way mirroring yet. We do have one-way
mirroring atm, though, so it'd be nice if that continued to work.

> I don't see how it makes us reliant on a mapping file, though?

If we decide to omit the primary <link>, we'd need a mapping
from directory to spec section.

I suppose we could automate one from the fragment IDs, though.

Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2016 18:35:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:21 UTC