- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:34:34 -0400
- To: Geoffrey Sneddon <me@gsnedders.com>
- Cc: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On 04/13/2016 01:49 PM, Geoffrey Sneddon wrote: > > I think you can't count to three. :) Caching is a Hard Problem. ;) > I think everyone is happy to mirror such a directory structure (it is, > after all, roughly what everyone does today). I don't think it > requires people who use the tests to mirror the structure more than > the current situation does—if you want two-way mirroring, you > essentially have to use what the upstream repo uses anyway. Sure, but we don't have two-way mirroring yet. We do have one-way mirroring atm, though, so it'd be nice if that continued to work. > I don't see how it makes us reliant on a mapping file, though? If we decide to omit the primary <link>, we'd need a mapping from directory to spec section. I suppose we could automate one from the fragment IDs, though. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2016 18:35:12 UTC