Re: CSS test repo refactored - branch ready for review

1. Move everything in root/approved up one level, keeping original names and structure

This is probably a good time to rename the spec directories to the current shortname conventions. You can find a list of all the shortnames in Shepherd:
https://test.csswg.org/shepherd/administration/specification/  (admin only link)

No problem. I'll do it shortly.



Do we want to keep the 'src' directories in the spec directories?

The only useful files in the 'data' directories are the 'sections.dat' files (and maybe some licenses). These will go away at some point when the build code uses Shepherd's API directly, but for now I don't mind if they live directly in the spec directory and we lose the data directories too.


Ok, I'll make those changes in the branch now - move src/* and data/* up to the root of the spec dir. This was actually something I was wondering about, too.

[...]

I used git mv for all of the changes, so I believe I preserved history. Also, I took care of file naming collisions along the way (there were surprisingly very few)

Peter, when you have a chance can you look at the branch and let me know what else I need to do to get this working right with the tools?

I'll take care of updating the tools and let you know when they're ready (actually I'll probably just land your changes when the tools are ready). Give me a couple of days or so.

Ok, great. Feel free to ping me if there's something I can do to help.



You'll see I removed all the old readmes describing the directories.  Once all the testing on this new structure is done, I'll draft new ones for the new tree.


A couple of minor questions:
- css3-selectors and selectors3 seem like they can be merged into one directory. These were already there in approved.  Peter, if they can be merged, which name to use?

Merge them, call the new directory 'selectors-3'.


- Can css3-2d-transforms/ safely be removed?

Yes.

Ok, I'll also take care of these 2 things.


Thanks!
-Rebecca