RE: Newer 100x100-blue-and-orange image replacing 100x100-gradient-blue-to-orange image

> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Gérard Talbot" [mailto:css21testsuite@gtalbot.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 4:02 AM
> To: Zhang, Zhiqiang
> Cc: Public CSS testsuite mailing list@w3.org; Santos, Thiago; Zhang, Haili; Yu,
> Ling L; Yang, Lei A
> Subject: Newer 100x100-blue-and-orange image replacing 100x100-gradient-
> blue-to-orange image
> 
> 
> Le Jeu 15 novembre 2012 23:02, "Gérard Talbot" a écrit :
> >
> > Le Jeu 15 novembre 2012 0:24, "Gérard Talbot" a écrit :
> >>
> >> Le Mer 14 novembre 2012 21:27, "Gérard Talbot" a écrit :
> >>> Le Ven 9 novembre 2012 3:28, Zhang, Zhiqiang a écrit :
> >>>>> Zhiqiang, let me know if you have more tests (and which tests) to
> >>> review, to approve.
> >>>>> Gérard
> >>>>> --
> >>>> Hi Gerard,
> >>>
> >>>> background-size-002 to 034 (except background-size-008 above) need
> >>>> to
> >>> be
> >>>> reviewed again, and to be approved :).
> 
> 
> 
> >>
> >> I am working on other images which would avoid creating fractions in
> >> calculations and when rescaling and which could be reliable and
> >> helping
> >> human testers notice test failures. It's not as easy as one might
> >> think.
> >>
> >> Top and left sides of such images should be with a distinct color
> >> and/or
> >> distinct pattern. Right and bottom sides of such images should use
> >> another distinct color and/or distinct pattern. That way, an human
> >> tester would see if a 1px is missing at right and/or bottom and if 1px
> >> is incorrectly repeated at right and/or bottom. When the
> >> background-size: with round value fails, then it is because there is a
> >> partially displayed image on the right and/or at the bottom. So, this
> >> explains the need to have differentiable color and/or pattern for the
> >> image.
> >
> >
> > I am not a keen expert with GIMP or photoshop. So I came up with
> > 100x100-gradient-blue-to-orange.png
> >
> > At least, such image solve the 2 main problems mentioned above and
> meets
> > the requirements I was listing.
> 
> 
> Zhiqiang,
> 
> I have created another image:
> 
> 100x100-blue-and-orange.png
> 
> which I believe is a bit clearer and simpler. My first, initial
> 100x100-gradient-blue-to-orange.png was due to GIMP inexperience. I
> believe is a bit clearer for people who will be taking these
> background-size-[025-034] tests.

Agree. 100x100-blue-and-orange.png is better.

committed changeset 4791:1d2d1d9ae507

> 
> I have updated
> 
> http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/review/background-size-025-
> review.html
> 
> http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/review/background-size-027-
> review.html
> 
> http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/review/background-size-028-
> review.html
> 
> http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/review/background-size-029-
> review.html
> 
> http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/review/background-size-030-
> review.html
> 
> http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/review/background-size-031-
> review.html
> 
> with their respectives reftests.
> 
> 
> I think it's important to try to create the best possible image for
> those kinds of tests. There will be other background-size-* tests later
> and I hope we'll all be reusing that same
> 100x100-blue-and-orange.png
> image.
> 
> Gérard
> --
> Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:
> http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/
> 
> CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011:
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html
> 
> CSS 2.1 test suite harness:
> http://test.csswg.org/harness/
> 
> Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite:
> http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-
> contributions-css21-testsuite.html

Received on Thursday, 22 November 2012 14:01:18 UTC