- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 22:25:31 -0500
- To: "Zhang, Zhiqiang" <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com>
- Cc: "Public CSS testsuite mailing list@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>, "Santos, Thiago" <thiago.santos@intel.com>, "Zhang, Haili" <haili.zhang@intel.com>, "Yu, Ling L" <ling.l.yu@intel.com>, "Yang, Lei A" <lei.a.yang@intel.com>
Le Ven 9 novembre 2012 3:28, Zhang, Zhiqiang a écrit : >> >> Zhiqiang, let me know if you have more tests (and which tests) to >> review, to approve. >> >> Gérard >> -- > background-size-002 to 034 (except background-size-008 above) need to be > reviewed again, and to be approved :). We discussed background-size-003 before. As coded, right now, background-size-003 is wrong, incorrect. The background positioning area is 100px tall and 150px wide. So, the smallest size such that both its width and its height are covered, painted by the image while maintaining an 1:1 ratio would be 150px by 150px and not a 100px (height) by 150px (width). We discussed background-size-003 before, which lead to background-size-cover-001 and background-size-cover-002 which I approved [1]. So the best to do here is to remove, retract background-size-003. Same thing with background-size-004. It lead to background-size-contain-001 and background-size-contain-002. So the best to do here is to remove, retract background-size-004. I am in the process of reviewing and approving all of the background-size-[002-034] tests. [1]: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2012Nov/0014.html Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite harness: http://test.csswg.org/harness/ Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Saturday, 10 November 2012 03:26:02 UTC