- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 00:00:34 -0500
- To: "Arron Eicholz" <arron.eicholz@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Public CSS test suite mailing list" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Arron,
[RC6]
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/width-undefined-001.htm
[nightly-unstable]
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/width-undefined-001.htm
<meta name="assert" content="The containing block's width
depends on this element's width because the resulting layout has
not been defined in CSS2.1." />
The test text assert is claming something that does not seem to make
sense. The proposition
"
because the resulting layout has not been defined in CSS2.1
"
has no reason to be stated, given in the test's text assert. The div's
width is 0 since its content span is taken out of normal flow.
The span#span1 used width is given by its "XX" content.
Section 10.3.7 should apply
10.3.7 Absolutely positioned, non-replaced elements
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visudet.html#abs-non-replaced-width
"
'width' and 'right' are 'auto' and 'left' is not 'auto', then the width
is shrink-to-fit .
"
I think the purpose and target of this test should be re-considered.
Gérard
--
Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/
CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011:
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html
CSS 2.1 test suite harness:
http://test.csswg.org/harness/
Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2012 05:01:04 UTC