Re: Two issues in css2.1/t1504-c543-txt-decor-00-d-g.html

Thanks a lot for the quick response,
So, can i take these links as a proof that test case has been modified to
suit the spec as mentioned in the link?

-Sravan.

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:25:03 +0100, Sravan <sra1sandela@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  This is actually in reference to one of the bugs in webkit(
>> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_**bug.cgi?id=61699<https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61699>),
>> but found that it is
>> basically a test case issue.
>>
>
> Is this based on some old copy of the testsuite? As far as I can tell, at
> least one of the issues was addressed more than two years ago, and neither
> of them apply in the current version.
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/public-css-testsuite/**
> 2010Jan/0032.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2010Jan/0032.html>(note that the first link there gives 301 Moved Permanently)
>
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/**css2.1/20110323/html4/c543-**
> txt-decor-000.htm<http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/c543-txt-decor-000.htm>
>
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/**css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/**
> c543-txt-decor-000.htm<http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/c543-txt-decor-000.htm>
>
> --
> Øyvind Stenhaug
> Core Norway, Opera Software ASA
>

Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2012 11:22:34 UTC