Thanks a lot for the quick response, So, can i take these links as a proof that test case has been modified to suit the spec as mentioned in the link? -Sravan. On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com> wrote: > On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:25:03 +0100, Sravan <sra1sandela@gmail.com> wrote: > > This is actually in reference to one of the bugs in webkit( >> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_**bug.cgi?id=61699<https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61699>), >> but found that it is >> basically a test case issue. >> > > Is this based on some old copy of the testsuite? As far as I can tell, at > least one of the issues was addressed more than two years ago, and neither > of them apply in the current version. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/public-css-testsuite/** > 2010Jan/0032.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2010Jan/0032.html>(note that the first link there gives 301 Moved Permanently) > > http://test.csswg.org/suites/**css2.1/20110323/html4/c543-** > txt-decor-000.htm<http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/c543-txt-decor-000.htm> > > http://test.csswg.org/suites/**css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/** > c543-txt-decor-000.htm<http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/c543-txt-decor-000.htm> > > -- > Øyvind Stenhaug > Core Norway, Opera Software ASA >Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2012 11:22:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:18 UTC